Browse this module
-
About the module: Understanding Peer Review
By Elena Semeyko -
A brief history of peer review
By Luke Fleet -
Types of peer review
By Federico Levi -
Why do most journals not use a double blind peer review evaluation for manuscripts?
By Peter Gorsuch -
The benefits and limitations of peer review
By Federico Levi -
Which type of peer review do you prefer?
By Elena Semeyko -
How editors select referees
By Elisa De Ranieri -
How editors assess referee reports
By Anke Sparmann -
Editors' experiences: Being a first time peer reviewer
By Elisa De Ranieri -
Rewards for referees
By Federico Levi -
When to accept or decline an offer to peer review
By Anke Sparmann -
What excellent referee reports look like
By Leonie Mueck -
Best practice guidelines for scientific peer review
By Elisa De Ranieri -
Think like a peer reviewer when you read a paper
By Elena Semeyko -
FAQ: How many reviewers typically see an original research manuscript before it is published?
By Elisa De Ranieri -
FAQ: Do editors honour the excluded referees listed in the cover letter?
By Catherine Potenski -
FAQ: How do I train junior colleagues to be peer reviewers?
By Leonie Mueck -
A paper that was not peer reviewed
By Elena Semeyko -
Module summary and further work: Understanding Peer Review
By Elena Semeyko -
Useful resources: Understanding Peer Review
By Elena Semeyko
Comments are disabled