23 Comments

Thumb default avatar
Yasin Ghulam almost 2 years ago

Obviously, the every author get updated and new breakthrough in the advancement of currently going on progress in the relevant as well in broad spectrum of his expertise and field.

Thumb default avatar
Muhammad Naeem Nizam almost 2 years ago

in a process of peer review, every reviewer gets a lot of knowledge and new ideas for own interest.

Thumb default avatar
Dr. Felix Bongomin over 1 year ago

I have the same feeling.


Thumb default avatar
Aydin ashrafi over 1 year ago

Peer reveiw is good for both author and reviewer becuase they will be familiar with other sight

Thumb default avatar
Israel Borokini over 1 year ago

Peer review process is absolutely important, as long as the methodology and scientific process are thoroughly addressed, rather than mere grammatical edits

Thumb default avatar
Sunil Kumar over 1 year ago

Very nicely explained by  Dr George Booth 

Thumb default avatar
Thulisile P. Jaca over 1 year ago

Well explained Dr George Booth, i liked that last part that authors shouldn't be expecting to be praised for their work but rather have a mind set of how their work can be improved.

Thumb default avatar
THIAGARAJAN over 1 year ago

really awesome 

Thumb default avatar
THIAGARAJAN over 1 year ago

nice 

Thumb default avatar
LAL DEVAYANI VASUDEVAN NAIR over 1 year ago

exactly! when i did my first publication i went through all these feelings. its not questioning ones knowledge or sincerity in the work, but to see our work from a different perspective. after all, not all who read our article will think the same way .hence knowing from others point of view before publication is very important especially to make the reader stay on our topic.

Thumb default avatar
Srinivasan Jayaraman over 1 year ago

valid points addressed...

Thumb default avatar
Naoko Sato over 1 year ago

Thumb default avatar
SEEMA PARTE over 1 year ago

i think reviewing requires a fine balance of knowledge and scrutiny and poise in the form of the decision you submit for a manuscript. It is essential to develop required key skills since paper publication puts at stake so much more than science-at a personal level and career point of view and the amount of time and resources utilized in the study

Thumb default avatar
Tadesse Bekele Tafesse about 1 year ago

I agree with the peer review process as it improves the quality of the manuscript

Thumb default avatar
Gabriela Perez Tort about 1 year ago

I think as Dr Booth says,  that when our manuscript is being reviewed, we should not consider it a battle against the reviewer but on the contrary a colaborative work in order to produce a better and more clear paper.

Thumb kamuyu mwai
Kamuyu Mwai 10 months ago

Peer reviewing also deepens scope & elongates perception of the reviewer in the subject he/she is reviewing. There is always something new to learn.

Thumb default avatar
Raghed ibrahim esmaeel 10 months ago

Thanks for .Dr George about this video. Yes, of course, more quality work of the paper, more interesting focus on the manuscript of the article.

Thumb default avatar
Rabiu Aliyu 8 months ago

I definitely share the same feelings and sentiments with Dr. Booth. Being in the academia, albeit in a developing country with poor funding and obsolete facilities, i too had published quite a number of papers and I benefited from the suggestions of the reviewers and at the end the quality of the papers got a boost.But occasionally I was annoyed or felt unduly " cheated" when my manuscript was rejected only to find a similar manuscript inferior in content and poorer in language from Asia for example, published by the same journal (not by Nature group of journals any way) .

Thumb default avatar
Marina Afanasyeva 5 months ago

These are exactly my thoughts about peer-review! First, I always feel angry when I receive the reviewer's comments, but then I think of all the above-said and feel grateful to the person who invested her/his time in me. If the reviewer has these questions, then many other readers will have them as well.

Thumb default avatar
Jürgen Weippert 4 months ago

Concerning the test on the previous page: I went through a similar tutorial from ACS. Apparently, their accept/decline/flag regulations are different; quite a number of ACS "flag" cases were supposed to be declined here.

Thumb oyetoro oyebode stephen

Yes , Dr. Booth had just hit the nail on the head of the mindset that authors should have when they receive feedback on their manuscripts.

Thumb default avatar
Mouna Lehassani 3 months ago

I find it very objective...

Thumb default avatar
Natalia Palii 3 months ago

The peer review process is a dialog between the author and reviewer