20 Comments

Thumb default avatar
Yasin Ghulam almost 2 years ago

It’s important for everyone willing to be a potential reviewer that  make an honest assessment as to whether have the expertise to provide a useful evaluation of the paper and more important is the timely response.

Thumb default avatar
Muhammad Naeem Nizam almost 2 years ago

Qualification and availability of time are very important factors while accepting the invitation for a review 

Thumb default avatar
Md. Galal Uddin almost 2 years ago

Qualification, Free time and fairness are very important elements for a reviewing invitation accept or reject.

Thumb default avatar
Aydin ashrafi over 1 year ago

Very usefull

Thumb 20160514 122446
Emanuel Vamanu over 1 year ago

I read a very interesting point of view.

Thumb default avatar
Dr.P.MANGA VENI over 1 year ago

Accept when you have the zeal and commitment  on the peer review.

Thumb default avatar
LAL DEVAYANI VASUDEVAN NAIR over 1 year ago

if this process is followed we would not be reading so many unworthy articles!!

so, basically 3 questions- am i qualified?, do i have time? any conflict?

Thumb default avatar
Manica Negahdaripour over 1 year ago

Useful points are mentioned here. In addition to the three main questions for deciding to accept as a reviewer, it is good to know that it may be possible to comment on a part of paper, or suggest other reviewers.

Thumb foto rosto

Great text! Really important to be aware of the importance and consequences of having accepted the invitation to peer review.

Thumb default avatar
Tadesse Bekele Tafesse about 1 year ago

Yes, qualification and time has a great impact on the quality of the paper to be reviewed. And, honest assessment is also critical and hence, the conflict of interest provides its own impact.

Thumb default avatar
Raimi Morufu Olalelan about 1 year ago

I 100% agree with the submission.

Thumb default avatar
SUDHEESH RAVI about 1 year ago

These are valuable information  one reviewer should bear in mind.

Thumb default avatar
Onaoluwa Abimbola 11 months ago

This is concise and straight to the point. I love the reasons outlined.

Thumb kamuyu mwai
Kamuyu Mwai 10 months ago

Indeed, its worth reflect (self-evaluate) whether by being a "reviewer", you are adding value to the work you are reviewing or "displacing" the work.

Thumb default avatar
Raghed ibrahim esmaeel 10 months ago

Yes, both qualification along with time very important.  

Thumb default avatar
Valentina Moro 7 months ago

Thumb default avatar
Valentina Moro 7 months ago

I agree that reviewing papers is a huge opportunity for studying and looking to aspects of your research field that are not usual for you. The time is often too short and academics are so busy that sometimes during review processes you focus only on the things you already know.

Thumb default avatar
Trung Ngoc Ngo 4 months ago

great

Thumb default avatar
Natalia Palii 3 months ago

The outlined  key points are extremely important

Thumb default avatar

This means that for one to peer review a paper she needs to do a proper assessment on availability and capabilities