28 Comments

Go to the profile of Yasin Ghulam
Yasin Ghulam about 1 year ago

Yes, I am strongly agree with the statement give as the Reviewer comments have huge impact on an author’s career as for consideration or rejection of the manuscript.

Go to the profile of Muhammad Naeem Nizam
Muhammad Naeem Nizam about 1 year ago

A  reviewer has very important responsibility in the whole  process of acceptance or rejection of a scientific research article and also a necessary impact on the future of science.  

Go to the profile of Md. Galal Uddin
Md. Galal Uddin about 1 year ago

Peer reviewer responsibility is very sensitive for author manuscript approval by any editor. So, peer reviewer responsibility is very important and significant for any publishing sector.

Go to the profile of Israel Borokini
Israel Borokini about 1 year ago

Constructive feedback, yes! I hope all reviewers, including me, would remember that.

Go to the profile of AAMIR RAINA
AAMIR RAINA 12 months ago

Agreed

Go to the profile of Mekhled Alzaza
Mekhled Alzaza 12 months ago

Yes I agree that  the peer reviewer has the power  on the process of publication but at the same time he has  a big chalange towards the authors .

Go to the profile of Aydin ashrafi
Aydin ashrafi 12 months ago

yes i strongly agree with this statement. 

Go to the profile of Felix Jose  Gonzalez Gonzalez

What are the honorarium for a Peer Reviewer?

Go to the profile of Eduards Krustiņš
Eduards Krustiņš 11 months ago

None. It's a voluntary activity, that has no monetary benefits.

Go to the profile of Karen Amparo Meneses Córdoba

Yes, just responsability and discipline with the process because is important for everybody.

Go to the profile of Celia Fortuna Rodrigues
Celia Fortuna Rodrigues 10 months ago

"Delays can have serious consequences - for example, the authors being ‘scooped’ by others working in the same area or implications for future grant applications." - This is really important.

Go to the profile of Azhar Gaber Shalaby
Azhar Gaber Shalaby 10 months ago

yes, it is really very sensitive and important tasks for reviewer to review other iterations for a paper, to be sure of no duplication or overlapping. 

Go to the profile of Dr.P.MANGA VENI
Dr.P.MANGA VENI 9 months ago

i agree with it

Go to the profile of Dr Dinesh Uthra
Dr Dinesh Uthra 9 months ago

Very good task and give better , effective and quickly publication. 

Go to the profile of Raghunandan BL
Raghunandan BL 9 months ago

Very good explanation about reviewers responsibility. 

Go to the profile of LAL DEVAYANI VASUDEVAN NAIR

a peer reviewer has to balance his critical thinking and sensitivity while making comments as the paper to be published should be brought out with maximum impact and at the same time not much delay. the aim of review should be to augment the value and not topple.

Go to the profile of Manica Negahdaripour
Manica Negahdaripour 9 months ago

Considering the important role of the reviewer, as is explained very well in this section, "being fair and constructive" is a useful sentence for every reviewer to keep in mind.

Go to the profile of Adamkolo Mohammed Ibrahim

I don't know if I'm a bit more patient, ever since I started peer review I'd do it until the final iteration. It gladdens me to go through authors' responses and see how they managed to respond to my criticisms and comments. After all, I stand to gain a lot from that because if I'm a reviewer here I may be an author with other journals.

Go to the profile of Saartjie Roux
Saartjie Roux 6 months ago

Agree

Go to the profile of Pramodkumar P Gupta
Pramodkumar P Gupta 5 months ago

Yes, I agree with statement that review in iteration is good.....

Go to the profile of Tadesse Bekele Tafesse
Tadesse Bekele Tafesse 5 months ago

Delivering a timely report to the Editor is so important both for the author(s) and the Journals. This is because the author(s) might do their activities in a place where they are not living as in a collaborative work, i.e. they use other laboratory facilities and in case the peer reviewers observe, as they are experts, some lab work is missing, the author(s) will get the opportunity to perform and fulfill the gap easily.

Go to the profile of Raimi Morufu Olalelan
Raimi Morufu Olalelan 5 months ago

Very Informative

Go to the profile of SUDHEESH RAVI
SUDHEESH RAVI 3 months ago

It is a responsible job and should be a true person to hold the position other wise the authors will suffer so the review must ethical in nature.

Go to the profile of Peeyush Dahal
Peeyush Dahal 3 months ago

reviewer should be constructive never a destructive. one should keep in mind that there are always rooms for improvement .reconstruction is better idea..

Go to the profile of SANTOSH KUMAR BHASKAR
SANTOSH KUMAR BHASKAR 2 months ago

its about of ettiquettes of peer reviewer.

Go to the profile of Dr.R.Rajasekaran
Dr.R.Rajasekaran about 2 months ago

Yes.Review is  very important task to explore the truth and basic principles in Science and Technology

Go to the profile of Kamuyu Mwai
Kamuyu Mwai about 2 months ago

I wholesomely agree with the above. No need to participate in a peer review if you ain't ready, prepared or in the "element".  

Go to the profile of Raghed ibrahim esmaeel
Raghed ibrahim esmaeel about 2 months ago

I agree all Peer reviewer's responsibilities. Peer reviewer, when decided to be as one of Peer reviewers. Need to focus on both time, and checking the paper by submitting his opinion as a decision rejection or acceptance of this paper.