Thumb default avatar
Muhammad Naeem Nizam over 1 year ago

In peer review, not only positive results should be taken as most important part of manuscripts. Results are the contribution to the science either positive or negative.

Thumb default avatar
Shubhra 12 months ago

I really like this concept...

Thumb kamuyu mwai
Kamuyu Mwai 10 months ago

Good points learned

Thumb img 20181004 1215024
Saritha Lingareddy 7 months ago

1. Its true; especially when testing a new hypothesis or proving existing ones. One may not always be successful working towards either of these. If it  goes unpublished, how would one want to explore or think in a different way?

2.Registered reports seem interesting. Its less burden on both the authors and the reviewers; unaware of this. I really appreciate this module.

3. Never thought that peer review is such an  intricate and organized process. This course is very informative.