10 Comments

Thumb default avatar
Yasin Ghulam over 1 year ago

Okay. 

Thumb default avatar
Muhammad Naeem Nizam over 1 year ago

Al right

Thumb default avatar
Anna Paakkonen over 1 year ago

Why is this after the exercise that tests your knowledge on the different types of peer review?

Thumb default avatar
Dr. Mahendra Kumar C over 1 year ago

Agreed 

Thumb kamuyu mwai
Kamuyu Mwai 10 months ago

Good explanation

Thumb default avatar
Raghed ibrahim esmaeel 10 months ago

i agree.  

Thumb img 20181004 1215024
Saritha Lingareddy 7 months ago

Does a journal consist of different review types wherein the authors have an option to choose the review type. Is Single blind or double blind peer review purely the nature/policy of the Journal ?

Thumb default avatar
Andre Paulino de Lima 4 months ago

It is interesting to see how asymmetry in identity information was explored in peer-review processes: we have (0,0) = double blind, (0,1) = single blind, and (1,1) open, but we do not have (1,0) -- which would correspond to a process where the authors know the reviewer identity and the reviewer is does not know the identity of the authors.

Thumb default avatar
Jürgen Weippert 4 months ago

I hereby emphasize Anna Paakkonen's comment: Why is this after the exercise that tests your knowledge on the different types of peer review?

Thumb default avatar
Natalia Palii about 2 months ago

OK, I'll   keep in mind this classification