Think like a peer reviewer when you read a paper FREE SAMPLE

.

Go to the profile of Jill Adie
Feb 13, 2019

Want to get access to this course?

To get started, Register for your free Nature Masterclasses account. Signed up previously? Sign in here

25 Comments

Go to the profile of MOH NASEEM
MOH NASEEM over 2 years ago

it should be in more scrutinized way.

Go to the profile of Khafzam Aljabry
Khafzam Aljabry over 2 years ago

Mostly students and articles reviwer are likely to read the data.Because for student they would like to get information from what they studied or what they will study.

Go to the profile of Mohammed Zaki
Mohammed Zaki over 1 year ago

the most advantages to be reviwer that improve our critical thinking

Go to the profile of Muhammad Naeem Nizam
Muhammad Naeem Nizam over 1 year ago

Before the final submission of our paper, we should look at our paper as a reviewer that can increase the chances of acceptance of our paper.

Go to the profile of Aroyehun AbdulQudus
Aroyehun AbdulQudus about 1 year ago

The novelty of the paper is very significant

Go to the profile of Wisam Makki Salim
Wisam Makki Salim about 1 year ago

I think publishing the data will also be important

Go to the profile of Muhammad Ibrahim Abdulhamid Elsayed

I think check list is a very important to have a real scientific paper, as this helps us to be more and more accurate about what we are doing.

Go to the profile of Valeriu Ungureanu
Valeriu Ungureanu about 1 year ago

Go to the profile of Valeriu Ungureanu
Valeriu Ungureanu about 1 year ago

Useful checklists!

Go to the profile of IBRAHIM MAMADOU Abdoul Kadir
IBRAHIM MAMADOU Abdoul Kadir about 1 year ago

it allows you to be very critical in the analysis of articles

Go to the profile of Sonam Gupta
Sonam Gupta about 1 year ago

In general, students, researchers and reviewers  are most likely to read papers and their data for their own research work and future objectives.

Go to the profile of Rounak Haddadi
Rounak Haddadi about 1 year ago

Go to the profile of Dr. Ram Kishor Fagodiya
Dr. Ram Kishor Fagodiya 12 months ago

The peer review should be done critically. It  enhance the critical thinking of reviewer. Whether the result are clearly written. How it is different than the previously published work?

Go to the profile of SUNIL  PRASAD
SUNIL PRASAD 11 months ago

Go to the profile of SUNIL  PRASAD
SUNIL PRASAD 11 months ago

very significant help to the researcher.

Go to the profile of SUNIL  PRASAD
SUNIL PRASAD 11 months ago

very sufficient knowledge for us.

Go to the profile of Adedokun Kamoru Ademola
Adedokun Kamoru Ademola 10 months ago

1. Checklist is important

2. Innovative idea and/or novelty of the that study adds colour to the taste

3. Good methodology is highly important

Go to the profile of AYOMIDE ISAAC FAROTIMI
AYOMIDE ISAAC FAROTIMI 9 months ago

Helpful checklist

Go to the profile of Kamuyu Mwai
Kamuyu Mwai 6 months ago

Good, relevant points about ideal review

Go to the profile of Marco Daniel Silva Ramos

It seems like its a good idea to have a checklist when I'm writing when we have a peer review we have to follow a line of thinking I really like it when I see the video of the paper that really challenges that view of bacterial infections.

Go to the profile of payal mittal
payal mittal 5 months ago

good

Go to the profile of payal mittal
payal mittal 5 months ago

it should be clear in concepts

Go to the profile of M
M 4 months ago

srtew

Go to the profile of Le The Vinh
Le The Vinh 4 months ago

Thank you for your free sample.

Go to the profile of Javid Rezaei Lord
Javid Rezaei Lord 5 days ago

We have to review it and check the plagiarism.